Naresh Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCC482/150/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| SL. No Date |
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|
| C482 No.150 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Deepak Petshali, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 4. This is second C482 application. The previous one was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the applicant on 14.06.2023 without any liberty. 5. Since the earlier C482 application was dismissed as withdrawn and no liberty has been granted to the applicant and now on the similar set of facts, the present C482 application has been filed, which is exactly the misuse of the process of the Court, therefore, the present C482 application is hereby dismissed. However, keeping in view the fact that the lawyer appearing on behalf of the applicant is a young lawyer, no cost is being imposed upon the applicant. 6. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. |
||
| (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 04.03.2025 AK |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- C482/150/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court