Second bail application dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the trial had concluded and the applicant had been convicted by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:UHC:6813
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA2/339/2023 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Amit Satyawali proxy counsel for Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the applicant. |
|||
| 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General along with Mr. Vipul Painuali, learned A.G.A. and Mr. Vijay Khanduri, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit at Bar that the present bail application has become infructuous, as the trial has already concluded and the applicant has been convicted by the learned trial court. 4. In view of the above, the second bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| (Alok Mahra, J.) 02.08.2025 Mamta |
2025:UHC:6813
Applicant
State
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
