Dismissed¶8

Akash Alias Bunty v. State of Uttarakhand

High Court of Uttarakhand (Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.), 10.06.2025 – BA2 No.216 of 2023

Uttarakhand HC10 Jun 2025BA2/216/2023

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second bail application (BA2 No.216 of 2023, High Court of Uttarakhand) rejected on 10.06.2025 by Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.; charges: Sections 363, 366-A, 386, 376(3), 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 1(l)/6 POCSO Act; Case Crime No. 846 of 2019, P.S. Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar; applicant in jail since 21.12.2019; first bail application dismissed 08.03.2021 by Coordinate Bench; prosecution evidence cited: victim's Sections 161 & 164 Cr.P.C. statements fully supporting prosecution version and medical report opining hymen torn.

What did the court decide?

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court was not inclined to grant bail to the applicant at this stage. ¶7

Akash Alias Bunty Vs State of Uttarakhand — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Uttarakhand HC (2025)

¶1

2025:UHC:4775

¶2

SL. No.	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA2 No.216 of 2023 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Amicus Curiae for the applicant. Mr. Tumul K. Nainwal, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.
			2. This is second bail application moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in Case Crime No. 846 of 2019, under Section 363, 366-A, 386, 376(3), 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C. and Section 1(l)/6 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar. 3. The first bail application moved on behalf of the applicant was dismissed by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 08.03.2021. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has falsely been implicated in the instant crime; has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 21.12.2019. He submits that in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the same and will furnish the bail surety as per the satisfaction of this Court. 5. Per contra, learned State Counsel submits that victim in her statements recorded under Section 161 & 164 Cr.P.C. has fully supported the prosecution version. Furthermore, in the medical report of the prosecutrix, doctor has opined that her hymen was found torn.

¶3

2025:UHC:4775

¶4

I have considered the submission
advanced by the learned counsel for the
parties.
7. Having regard to the facts and
circumstances of the case, I am not
inclined to grant bail to the applicant at
this stage.
8. Consequently, the second bail
application is rejected.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
10.06.2025
Arpan
ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB987446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2025.06.11 09:53:25 +05'30'

Akash Alias Bunty v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akash Alias Bunty v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ripudaman Singh Negi Vs State of Uttarakhand

Jitendra Singh Vs State of Uttarakhand

Seema Vs State of Uttarakhand

Rakesh Malhotra Vs Smt. Mridu Hans

Smt. Nilesh Saini Vs State of Uttarakhand

Shamsher Ali Vs State of Uttarakhand