came to be lodged on 01.12.2022, which is after almost four and a half months of the alleged incident; that, in the statement of the victim recorded under Section 161 & 164 Cr.P.C., she has stated that the applicant inserted his finger in her vagina and, as such, this is not a case of penetrative assault; that, the applicant as well as the complainant, who are husband & wife, were not having the cordial relations with each other, due to which, she roped the applicant in a false case; that, since the victim has been examined, there is no chance of applicant victimizing the complainant or the victim or his tampering with the evidence. Learned Senior Advocate for the applicant submits that in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the same and will furnish the bail surety as per the satisfaction of this Court. 4. Learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant, namely, Jitendra Singh be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned. (Alok Mahra, J.) 06.06.2025 Arpan
