Applicant sought bail in a cow progeny case involving BNS Section 303(2) and the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act. The court found it fit for bail, allowed the application, and directed release on personal bond with two sureties.
Applicant released on bail on personal bond with two reliable sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.153 of 2025
Harun Urf Satta
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant appeared through video conferencing.
Mr. Akshay Latwal, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.888 of 2024, dated 11.12.2024, under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/5/11 of The Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2
court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 12.02.2025
Sanjay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant in judicial custody under FIR No.888 of 2024 deserves release on bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Harun Urf Satta
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
