Vinod Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-Judge order dated 11.02.2025 in BA1 No.1110 of 2023 dismissing a bail application as rendered infructuous on the concession of the applicant's counsel (Mr. Gulshan Pandey, Advocate) at the outset; State represented by Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A.; signed by Ravindra Maithani, J.; no statutory provisions or case law cited; no relief granted and no monetary quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
The bail application is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, upon learned counsel for the applicant submitting at the very outset that the application had become infructuous. ¶1