Mohd Ashfaq v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCBA1/37/2025
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA1 No.37 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. |
||||
| Ms. Shruti Joshi, Advocate for applicants, through video conferencing. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder the State. At the very outset, learned counsel the applicants seeks permission withdraw the bail application. The permission is accorded. The bail application is dismissed withdrawn. |
the for for to as |
|||
| (Ravindra Maithani 10.02.2025 RV |
J.) |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BA1/37/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court