Vikash Sharma v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPSB/246/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSB No.246 of 2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel for the petitioner. |
|||
| 2. Mr. G.S. Negi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State. 3. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh, if required. 5. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above. |
|||
| (Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 05.06.2024 AK |
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Pankaj Purohit
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPSB/246/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court