This judgment dismisses a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging an appellate court order that directed certain documents to be kept on record and consideration at the hearing. The court found no illegality in the summary order.
Writ petition dismissed; pending application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No. 288 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. 1. Mr. Mukesh Singh Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 06.01.2024, whereby the application Paper No. 171(ka) by which certain documents filed by the appellant (petitioner herein) to be considered in the decision of the case were directed to be kept on record and it has been observed that these documents will be considered at the time of the hearing of the appeal. The learned Appellate Court by the same order directed the appellant to supply the copies of the documents to the respondents-landlord and they have also been given opportunity to file documents in rebuttal thereof. 3. Having gone through the impugned order dated 06.01.2024, this Court does not find any illegality or infirmity in the order for the reason that the reasons in the order are summary in nature, and, more so, by the impugned order the application has neither been rejected nor the documents were thrown by the Court out of the record. 4. In this view of the matter, no interference is required in the order impugned. |
| 5. Accordingly, the writ dismissed. 6. Pending application(s), stands disposed of. |
petition is if any, also |
|---|---|
| (Pankaj Vacat 06.02 Parul |
Purohit, J.) ion Judge .2024 |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with an appellate court order keeping documents on record for future consideration.
Whether the appellate court order suffers from any illegality or infirmity requiring writ interference.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent-Landlord
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
