In C4 0 7 No. 9 / 2 0 2 3, the Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tewari, A.C.J., dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. Any interim order stood vacated. No substantive legal proposition was formulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C4 0 7 No. 9 / 2 0 2 3 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J. None appears of the applicant. (2) This transfer application is dism issed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J.) 4 .1 1 .2 0 2 4 Pr |
Unknown Applicant
Manoj Kumar Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
