Transfer application seeking shifting of a criminal miscellaneous case under Sections 307 and 120B IPC from Ramnagar to Haridwar; since the case had already been disposed of by the trial court, the transfer prayer did not survive and the application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C4 0 7 No. 1 4 / 2 0 2 3 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J. None for the applicant. Mr. K.S. Bora, Deputy AG, with Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Pankaj Kapil, Advocate, for the respondent no. 5 and 6. (2) Applicant has sought transfer of Crim inal Miscellaneous Case No. 162 of 2023, State of Uttarakhand vs. Mahesh Chandra Tamta, under Section 307, 120B IPC, from the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramnagar, District Nainital to court of competent jurisdiction in District Haridwar. However, as per communication dated 26.10.2024, received from ACJM, Ramnagar, Crim inal Miscellaneous Case No. 162 of 2023 has been disposed of by the concerned court on 29.5.2023. |
|||
| (3) In such view of the matter, prayer for transfer do not survive. Transfer application is accordingly dism issed as infructuous. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J.) 4 .1 1 .2 0 2 4 Pr |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant (transfer applicant)
State of Uttarakhand
Respondent No. 5
Respondent No. 6
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
