The petition was dismissed as it was withdrawn by the learned counsel on the ground that the writ petition had become infructuous. Pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL
WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 624 OF 2022 01ST MAY, 2023
BETWEEN :
Mayank Bhardwaj …..Petitioner. And
| State of Uttarakhand & ano | ther | …. | Respondents. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for the Petitioner | : | Mr. Harshit counsel. |
Sanwal, learned |
| Counsel for the State | : | Mr. J.C. Pande, Counsel. |
learned Standing |
| Counsel for the Respondent No.2 | : | Mr. Ashish Joshi | , learned counsel. |
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the present writ petition on the ground that the same has become infructuous.
(VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.)
(RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.)
Dated: 01st May, 2023 NISHANT
Mayank Bhardwaj
State of Uttarakhand & ano
VIPIN SANGHI
RAKESH THAPLIYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
