The single judge meritlessly dismissed the vague writ petition (PIL) of Dilbagh Singh as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 66 OF 2023 01ST MAY, 2023
BETWEEN :
Dilbagh Singh …..Petitioner. And
State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Pacholia, learned counsel. Counsel for the State : Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General.
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi)
The writ petition is completely vague and bereft of particulars.
(VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.)
(RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.)
Dated: 01st May, 2023 NISHANT
Dilbagh Singh
State of Uttarakhand
Vipin Sanghi
Rakesh Thapliyap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
