Single judge disposed of contempt proceedings after findings of compliance with the writ court order by learned State Counsel, uncontroverted by petitioner.
Contempt proceedings dropped and notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLCON 2 3 2 / 2 0 1 8 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Sunil Upadhyaya, Advocate, i/ b Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pacholia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jagdish Bisht, Standing Counsel, for the respondents. Learned State Counsel points out that the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with. He refers to the averment made in the compliance affidavit. Above statement is not disputed by Mr. Sunil Upadhyaya, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. In such view of the matter, contempt proceedings are dropped. Notice is discharged. The contempt petition is disposed of. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 1 5 .3 .2 0 2 3 Pr |
Petitioner
Respondents
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
