The High Court held that the C-482 application filed by the applicants was infructuous since the matter was amicably settled in the trial court, and accordingly dismissed the application.
Application dismissed as infructuous due to settlement in trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C482 No. 406 of 2016 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Anant Dhaka, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. Mr. Kuldeep Rawal, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. It is informed by the learned counsel for the applicants that the matter has been amicably settled in the trial court. 4. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicants, C-482 application has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, C-482 application is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 08.06.2023 PN/- |
Applicants
State of Uttarakhand
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
