Hearing a bail application by an applicant in judicial custody under offences related to forgery and information technology. The High Court allowed the bail by observing that the case appears fit for bail despite additional charges.
Release on bail on personal bond and execution of two reliable sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No. 88 of 2022
Pankaj Kumar ….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Mukesh Rawat and Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Pankaj Kumar is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.21 of 2021, dated 08.09.2021, under Sections 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 66-D of The Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station Gopeshwar, District Chamoli. He has sought his release on bail.
2
6. The bail application is allowed.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 05.12.2023
Sanjay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant charged under Sections 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act deserves bail.
Pankaj Kumar
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
