The single judge allowed the bail application on the ground that it rendered the subsequent proceedings infructuous.
Bail application allowed; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA1 No.1382 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Mukesh Rawat, Advocate for the applicant. |
|||
| Mr. Suresh Chandra Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. |
|||
| Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the bail application has rendered infructuous. |
|||
| It stands disposed of, accordingly. | |||
| (Ravindra Maithani J.) 05.12.2023 RV |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application has rendered infructuous.
applicant
State
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
