Dismissed
Gurmeet v. State of Uttarakhand through S.S.P. Haridwar
Uttarakhand HCBA1/428/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
428 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.…
What the court decided
AI extract
428 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA1 No. 428 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Amit Bhatt, D.A.G. for the State. Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi and Mr. Dharmesh Kumar, Advocates for the informant.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the bail application has been rendered infructuous because the applicant has already been convicted. The bail application stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 06.12.2023
Jitendra
Jitendra
State
Dharmesh Kumar
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court