The petitioners successfully withdrew the Writ Petition. Consequently, all pending applications were disposed of. The judgment was passed as a simple withdrawal order.
Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn; all pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J. AND SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE, J.
1 0TH MARCH, 2022
WRIT PETITION (CRL) No. 404 OF 2022
Between:
Preeti and another.
…Petitioners
and
State of Uttarakhand and others.
…Respondents
| Counsel for the petitioner. | : Mr. Ankurit Raj David, the learned proxy counsel for Mr. Mani Kumar, the learned counsel. |
|---|---|
| Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. |
: Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, the learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. |
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the following
JUDGMENT : ( per Sri S.K. Mishra, A.C.J.)
Mr. Ankurit Raj David, the associate of the
counsel on record Mr. Mani Kumar, the learned counsel, submits that the petitioners want to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
stand disposed of.
________________ S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.
R.C. KHULBE, J.
Dt: 10th March, 2022 Rahul
2
Preeti and another
State of Uttarakhand and others
S.K. MISHRA
R.C. KHULBE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
