This court allowed a petition for quashing criminal proceedings under Section 307 IPC. The court found an amicable settlement between parties and disposed of the pending case.
The entire proceedings of the case are quashed. Compounding Application No. 1 of 2022 stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 499 of 2022
Vipin Kumar ...... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and another ..... Respondents
Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Meena Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the respondent no.2.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The petitioner seeks quashing of
Criminal Case(ST) No.9 of 2021, “State Vs. Pawan Kumar”, under Section 307 IPC, pending in the court of 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar (for short, “the case”) on the basis of amicable settlement between the parties. A Compounding Application No. 1 of 2022 has been filed alongwith the affidavits of the parties.
2
3
entire proceedings of the case is hereby quashed.
stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 26.04.2022
Ravi/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Criminal Misc. Application filed for quashing proceedings under Section 307 IPC can be allowed on basis of amicable settlement.
Vipin Kumar
State of Uttarakhand and another
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
