This single-judge oral order allows the bail application of an applicant in judicial custody accused of drug possession under the NDPS Act. The court was satisfied that the case was fit for bail despite the lack of independent witnesses for recovery.
Released on bail on personal bond and two reliable sureties of equal amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 891 of 2022
Farman alias Kaakaa ….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Farman alias Kaakaa is in judicial custody in FIR No.340 of 2022, under Sections 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2
minimum quantity and the applicant is not a previous convict.
8. The bail application is allowed.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 25.04.2022
Sanjay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is fit to be granted bail in a possession case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, 1985.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Farman alias Kaakaa
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
