Sunl Ghildiyal v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCC482/397/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court used this.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-482 No. 397 of 2022 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.K. Jemini, Deputy Advocate General with Ms. Meena Bisht, Brief Holder for the State. After arguing at a great length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission is accorded. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|||
| (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 12.04.2022 Avneet/ |
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra Maithani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- C482/397/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court