In an oral order in a bail application regarding FIR under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, the Court allowed the release on bail not being dissimilar to the position of co-accused.
The applicant was enlarged on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 798 of 2022
Mehtab ….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. with Ms. Sonika Khulbe, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Mehtab is in judicial custody in FIR No.51 of 2022, under Sections 3, 5, 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Jhabrera, District Haridwar. She has sought her release on bail.
2
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 12.04.2022
Sanjay
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves release on bail considering co-accused have already been granted bail.
Whether the charge under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act is fit for bail.
Mehtab
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
