Dismissed
Dhaniram v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCC482/133/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
[No summary]
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petition is accorded.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C-482 No.133 of 2017 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
¶2
Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner.
¶3
Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. for the State.
¶4
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
¶5
Permission is accorded.
¶6
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
¶7
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 20.04.2022
¶8
Sanjay
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra Maithani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- C482/133/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court