Disposed
Jagdish Shetti v. State of Uttarakhand.
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/521/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No.521 of 2008 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. Gopal K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Suyash Pant, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. There are certain defects, which has been pointed out by the Registry, in the restoration application, which has been preferred by the writ petitioner. The nature of defects are not curable, hence, the Restoration Application No.920 of 2018, is directed to be dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty to file a fresh. |
|||
| (Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 09.03.2021 Arti |
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court