Dismissed
Dharma v. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Revenue
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/1194/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ON THE 8TH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ON THE 8TH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
ON THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE:
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
WRIT PETITION (M/S) No. 1194 of 2016
BETWEEN:
Dharmanand Painuly. ……….Petitioner
(There is no representation for the petitioner)
AND:
State of Uttarakhand & others. ...Respondents
(By Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand, Mr. V.K. Kohli, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Kanti Ram Sharma, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for respondent no. 4 and Mr. Shankar Agarwal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for respondent no. 5)
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the
petitioner.
(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.)
Arpan
Dharmanand Painuly
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court