Manage Ram v. Mr. Deepak Rawat
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt petition. The petitioner had no representation. The State of Uttarakhand was represented by Standing Counsel. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This is a contempt petition. The petitioner had no representation. The State of Uttarakhand was represented by Standing Counsel. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLCON No. 348 of 2018 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The Contempt Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 08.11.2021 Navin |
Unknown Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court