Dismissed
Bhadur Bandhopadhya v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPCRL/54/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No. 54 of 2020 Hon’ble R.C. Khu lbe, J. Mr. Shubhr Rastogi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vivek Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Rawal, learned A.G.A. for the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the present writ petition is rendered infructuous as final report has been submitted in the matter. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| ( R.C. Kh u lbe, J.) 0 6 .0 9 .2 0 2 1 Parul |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is rendered infructuous due to the submission of a final report.
Petitioner
State
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court