The single judge dismissed WPCRL No. 46 of 2020 as infructuous on the State's submission that a charge sheet had been submitted, rendering the petition no longer maintainable.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No. 46 of 2020 Hon’ble R.C. Khu lbe, J. None is present for the petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Rawal, learned A.G.A. for the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the present writ petition is rendered infructuous as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| ( R.C. Kh u lbe, J.) 0 6 .0 9 .2 0 2 1 Parul |
Petitioner (Name not stated)
State
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
