The Hon'ble R.C. Khulbe, J. disposed of WPCRL No.395 of 2019 as infructuous, noting the absence of the petitioner and the submission that the charge sheet had been filed in the underlying matter.
The criminal writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.395 of 2019 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. None is present for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Bisht, learned B.H. for the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that the charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. In view of the above statement, the present criminal writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 06.08.2021 Sukhbant |
Petitioner
State (represented by Mr. Siddharth Bisht)
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
