A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the State submitted a charge sheet in accordance with instructions, rendering the challenge to the proceeding untenable.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.285 of 2020 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rawal, learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that as per the instructions, charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. In view of the above submission, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 07.09.2021 Sukhbant |
Petitioner(s) name not specified in text
State
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
