Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 for quashing FIR. Investigation completed with charge-sheet submission by I.O., rendering the petition infructuous, leading to dismissal.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.2289 of 2019 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. Mr. Kuldeep Rawal, learned A.G.A. for the State. It is informed by the learned State Counsel that on completion of investigation, a charge-sheet has been submitted by the I.O. in the matter. In view of the above, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 02.09.2021 BS |
[Petitioner name not provided]
State
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
