Revision disposed of after parties filed compromise. Revisionist evicted possession; respondent relinquished rent/mesne profit. Compromise form part of decree.
Revision disposed of; compromise form part of decree; eviction and possession secured; rent claims relinquished.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
22nd OCTOBER, 2021
Civil Revision No. 78 of 2020
Between:
Arbaaz S/o Mohammad Yamin …Revisionist
and
Smt. Sajda Parveen …Respondent Counsel for the Revisionist : Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Ravi Shankar Kandpal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Mohammad Shafy, learned counsel.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
This revision has been filed under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 against the judgment and decree dated 24.08.2020, passed by the learned Judge, Small Cause Court/ 1st Additional District Judge, Haldwani in S.C.C. Suit No. 29 of 2018 “Smt. Sajda Parveen Vs. Arbaaz”, whereby the said suit was decreed for eviction of the revisionist/defendant, arrears of rent and damages for use of occupation.
2
7. No order as to costs.
___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt: 22nd October, 2021 Mamta
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sajda Parveen
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
