Km. Sunita Arya v. State Of Uttarakhand and Another
Uttarakhand HCBAC/7/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 8 .1 0 .2 0 2 1 | BAC No. 7 of 2014 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Mr. B.S. Bhandari, learned counsel for the applicant/ victim. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. P.S. Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Atul Sah, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for respondent no.2. Mr. Pratiroop Pande, the A.G.A. appearing for the State submitted that the respondent no.2/ accused has been acquitted in the present matter. In the light of the said submission, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant-victim submitted that the present bail cancellation application has become infructuous. In view of the above, Bail Cancellation Application No. 7 of 2014 is dismissed as infructuous. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 8 .1 0 .2 0 2 1 Mamta |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAC/7/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court