The High Court of Uttarakhand closed the contempt petition as the petitioner stated that the impugned writ court order had been complied with. The notice to the opposite party was discharged.
Notice issued to opposite party is discharged and the contempt petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ON THE 18th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE:
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI CONTEMPT PETITION No. 101 of 2019
BETWEEN:
Dr. Reenu Rani …Petitioner
(By Mr. Shubham Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate)
AND:
Ranveer Singh … Opposite Party
JUDGMENT
1. Mr. Shubham Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the order passed by Writ Court has been complied with.
2. In such view of the matter, the contempt petition is closed. Notice issued to the opposite party is hereby discharged.
(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.)
Nahid
Dr. Reenu Rani
Ranveer Singh
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
