The applicant alleged his death rendered the application infructuous. The High Court held the application under Section 482 CrPC was infructuous due to the applicant's death and dismissed it.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date 0 9 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 |
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C482 No. 451 of 2020 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. P.S. Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the applicant – Satish Chandra has died. Therefore, this application has become infructuous. The present C482 No.451 of 2020, filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is dismissed as infructuous. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 9 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 Pant/ |
|---|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application filed under Section 482 CrPC is maintainable when the applicant is deceased and hence infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satish Chandra
State
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
