learned
Brief
Holder
for
the |
State/ respondent
no.1
and
Mr. |
| Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for |
| the private respondent no.2. Perused the |
record. |
| The parties submitted that they |
| have settled their dispute and they are |
| living together peacefully. Smt. Israna, |
| the respondent no.2, has submitted that |
she is living peacefully and happily with |
| her husband, the applicant no.1, and, |
| the members of her matrimonial house |
| i.e. applicant nos.2 to 4. She submitted |
that
since
she
is
living
with
the |
| applicants, she does not want to proceed |
with this case.
The applicants and the respondent |
no.2 submitted that they have filed joint |
compounding
application
with
their |
affidavits.
The
applicants
and
the |
| respondent no.2 further submitted that |
they
have
filed
the
compounding |
| application along with their affidavits |
| with their free will and without any |
pressure.
|
| The learned counsel for the State |
has
no
objection
on
the
above |
submissions of the parties.
|
| Keeping in view of the totality of |
| the facts and circumstances of the case, |
this Court is of the view that ends of
|
| justice would met, if the impugned FIR, |
charge-sheet,
cognizance
and
|
summoning order are quashed.
|
| Resultantly, the First Information |
Report No.165 of 2019, registered with
|
Police
Station
Sahaspur,
Vikasnagar, |
District
Dehradun,
the
charge-sheet |
dated
18.01.2020,
cognizance
and |
summoning
order
dated
15.03.2021 |
| alongwith the entireproceedings of the |
