The court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the State informed that no case was made out against the petitioner after investigation. The interim order dated 16.03.2021 was vacated.
The writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order dated 16.03.2021 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.357 of 2021 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Joshi, learned B.H. for the State. Mr. Xitij Kaushik, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. It is informed by the learned State Counsel that after the investigation, no case is made out against the petitioner in the present matter. In view of the above, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous and the interim order dated 16.03.2021 is also hereby vacated. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 22.10.2021 BS |
Petitioner
State
Respondent no.4
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
