Pawan Singh Rana v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive decision on the application is recorded.
The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive decision on the application is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAI No.1027 of 2020 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. Mr. S. Pandey, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned B.H. for the State. The present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 11.11.2021 BS |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court