The single judge disposed of the writ petition, relying on a prior judgment (WPMS No. 973 of 2020) where the court had already decided the controversy.
Petitioner to pay penalty and fine to trigger release of vehicle; matter disposed in terms of WPMS No. 973 of 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPMS No. 2404 of 2020 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.
Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the question involved in this writ petition has been decided by this Court vide judgment dated 12.08.2020 rendered in WPMS No. 973 of 2020.
Learned Additional C.S.C. does not dispute the aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the petitioner.
Since the controversy involved now stands settled by the aforesaid judgment, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 12.08.2020 rendered in WPMS No. 973 of 2020 and it is provided that if petitioner pays the penalty and fine, as imposed by the authorities, the authority concerned shall consider releasing the vehicle in favour of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law.
(Manoj K. Tiwari, J.) 15.12.2020
Arpan
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj K. Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
