The Criminal Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous due to a closure report filed by the Investigating Officer and conceded by the proponents for the petitioners. Interim order vacated.
The Criminal Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 18.06.2020 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.789 of 2020 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Heard Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. P.S. Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State and Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for the private respondent No.3.
Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that an instruction has been received from the Investigating Officer that a closure report has been filed before the concerned court. He further submits that this writ petition has now become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioners also concedes that a closure report has been filed in the matter.
Therefore, the Criminal Writ Petition No.789 of 2020 is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 18.06.2020 stands vacated.
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 03.12.2020
JKJ/Sanjay
Petitioners
State
Private Respondent No.3
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
