The Single Judge allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Shailendra Krishna in a scholarship scam case involving IPC Sections 406, 420, 467-471, 120B, granting release on personal bond and two sureties.
Release on personal bond and two reliable sureties under specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.2245 of 2020
Shailendra Krishna ….Applicant Vs. State of Uttarakhand ……Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.
This bail application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in connection with Case Crime No.132 of 2019, registered with Police Station Muni-Ki-Reti, District Tehri Garhwal, for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the I.P.C.
2
of the applicant is similar to Narendra Panwar; Mr. Narendra Panwar has been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this High Court; the applicant has no criminal history; he is in custody since 22.10.2020.
i) the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required;
3
ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case;
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 02.12.2020
JKJ/Sanjay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves regular bail in the facts and circumstances of the case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shailendra Krishna
State of Uttarakhand
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
