The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel for the petitioners stating that the husband and wife are now living peacefully together and no further prosecution is intended.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.2208 of 2019
Hon’ble Ravi Malimath, J.
Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.
Shri Subhra Rastogi, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Shri J. S. Virk, learned assistant government advocate for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequent to filing of the petition, the husband and wife are living peacefully together. Therefore, he does not intend to prosecute this matter further.
Hence, at his request petition is dismissed as withdrawn
(N.S. Dhanik, J.) (Ravi Malimath, J.) 01.07.2020
Parul/k
Petitioner(s)
State
Ravi Malimath
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
