Simran Kaur Alias Sahiba v. State Ofuttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2019 Hon’ble Ravi Malimath, J. Hon’ble…
of 2019 Hon’ble Ravi Malimath, J. Hon’ble…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.1756 of 2019
Hon’ble Ravi Malimath, J.
Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.
Shri Navin Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Shri J. S.Virk, learned assistant government advocate for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequent to filing of the petition, the husband and wife are living peacefully together. Therefore, he does not intend to prosecute this matter further.
Hence, at his request petition is dismissed as withdrawn
(N.S. Dhanik, J.) (Ravi Malimath, J.) 01.07.2020
Parul/k
Petitioner
State
Ravi Malimath
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court