Anil Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. P.C.…
of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. P.C.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSS No. 4341 of 2018
Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.
Mr. P.C. Petshali, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Chief Standing Counsel with Mr. Sushil Vasistha, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner was appointed as Teacher in Government Primary School. He has been terminated from service on the ground that he secured appointment on the basis of forged certificates. According to the petitioner, he was terminated without following the procedure laid down in Uttarakhand Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 2003.
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for respondents submit that a similar controversy has been decided by the Division of this Court in Special Appeal No. 543 of 2017.
In view of the consensus between learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of judgment dated 13.02.2019 rendered by Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 543 of 2017 (State of Uttarakhand & others Vs. Krishan Pal Singh).
Learned counsel for the petitioner gives an undertaking on behalf of his client that petitioner shall extend full cooperation to ensure that departmental inquiry is concluded within four months.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Navin
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Uttarakhand & others Vs. Krishan Pal SinghRelied on¶8
Special Appeal No. 543 of 2017 (State of Uttarakhand & others Vs. Krishan Pal Singh)
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj K. Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court