This court rejected a modification application as wasteful since it had become infructuous due to further developments during its pendency. No other substantive issues are discernible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MCC No. 477 of 2016 In WPMS No. 1987 of 2016
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioners.
None for the respondents.
The Writ Petition was arising from an order as passed by the District Judge in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 52 of 2016. The Writ Petition was decided on 20th July, 2016. The petitioners seeking modification of the judgment dated 20th July, 2016, had filed the present Modification Application No. 477 of 2016, seeking modification of the judgment dated 20th July, 2016.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since during the pendency of the modification application, further developments have taken place, which has rendered the present application as to be infructuous.
Accordingly, the Modification Application No. 477 of 2016 is rejected as having rendered infructuous.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)
Dated 09.07.2019 Shiv
Ramji Srivastava
State of U.P.
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
