The Hon'ble Single Judge dismissed Writ Petition No. 1741 of 2016 by recording evidence-based submission that the writ petition had been rendered infructuous.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPMS No. 1741 of 2016 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ramesh Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of the instruction, which he has received from his client, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)
Dated 03.07.2019
Shiv
Petitioner
Respondent
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
