The single judge dismissed the criminal revision as dismissed by earlier order dated 12.07.2019 on the ground that it has rendered infructuous with the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLR No. 30 of 2015 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. Kailash Chandra, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, Advocate for the revisionist.
Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present criminal revision has been rendered infructuous with the passage of time.
Accordingly, the same is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)
Pooja
Nagesh Agarwal
State of Uttarakhand
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
