Writ petition filed by truck drivers seeking writ of mandamus against coercive measures for outstanding dues related to seized trucks. Court held drivers are not liable for dues owed by the owner.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (Crl.) No.758 of 2018
Rihan & another …..Petitioners
Versus
S.S.P. Haridwar & another ...Respondents
Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. Balvinder Singh, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Dated: 0 7 th May, 2018
Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief:
“i) A writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to take any corrosives measure against the petitioners in accordance with law.”
(V.K. Bist, J.) 07.5.2018
A.Kaur
Rihan
S.S.P. Haridwar
V.K. Bist
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
