Dismissed
Yatendra Pal v. State and Ors.
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/412/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2006 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr.…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2006 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPMS No. 412 of 2006 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tarun Lakhera, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. A.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is having no instructions from his client in the matter.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to revive, in case, instruction is received.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)
Dated 18.07.2017 Shiv
The Petitioner
The State of Uttarakhand
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court